Historical Record of the Fourth, or Royal Irish Regiment of Dragoon Guards. Containing an Account of the Formation of the Regiment in 1685; and of Its Subsequent — Themes and Context
Edition facts
Historical Record of the Fourth, or Royal Irish Regiment of Dragoon Guards. Containing an Account of the Formation of the Regiment in 1685; and of Its Subsequent — Themes and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 31,445 words, 2 hr 17 min estimated reading time, and 6 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 29.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Great Britain. Army -- History,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Hobiliers were accoutred and armed for the light and less important services of war, and were not considered qualified for a charge in line. Mounted Archers[1] were also introduced, and the English nation eventually became pre-eminent in the use of the bow.
About the time of Queen Mary the appellation of "_Men at Arms_" was changed to that of "_Spears_ and _Launces_." The introduction of fire-arms ultimately occasioned the lance to fall into disuse, and the title of the Horsemen of the first degree was changed to "_Cuirassiers_." The Cuirassiers were armed _cap-à-pié_, and their weapons were a sword with a straight narrow blade and sharp point, and a pair of large pistols, called petrenels; and the Hobiliers carried carbines. The Infantry carried pikes, matchlocks, and swords. The introduction of fire-arms occasioned the formation of regiments armed and equipped as infantry, but mounted on small horses for the sake of expedition of movement, and these were styled "_Dragoons_;" a small portion of the military force of the kingdom, however, consisted of this description of troops.
The formation of the present Army commenced after the Restoration in 1660, with the establishment of regular corps of Horse and Foot; the Horsemen were cuirassiers, but only wore armour on the head and body; and the Foot were pikemen and musketeers. The arms which each description of force carried, are described in the following extract from the "Regulations of King Charles II.," dated 5th May, 1663:--
"Each Horseman to have for his defensive armes, back, breast, and pot; and for his offensive armes, a sword, and a case of pistolls, the barrels whereof are not to be und^r. foorteen inches in length; and each Trooper of Our Guards to have a carbine, besides the aforesaid armes. And the Foote to have each souldier a sword, and each pikeman a pike of 16 foote long and not und^r.; and each musqueteer a musquet, with a collar of bandaliers, the barrels of which musquet to be about foor foote long, and to conteine a bullet, foorteen of which shall weigh a pound weight[2]."
The ranks of the Troops of Horse were at this period composed of men of some property--generally the sons of substantial yeomen: the young men received as recruits provided their own horses, and they were placed on a rate of pay sufficient to give them a respectable station in society.
On the breaking out of the war with Holland, in the spring of 1672, a Regiment of Dragoons was raised[3]; the Dragoons were placed on a lower rate of pay than the Horse; and the Regiment was armed similar to the Infantry, excepting that a limited number of the men carried halberds instead of pikes, and the others muskets and bayonets; and a few men in each Troop had pistols; as appears by a warrant dated the 2nd of April, 1672, of which the following is an extract:--
"Our will and pleasure is, that a Regiment of Dragoones which we have established and ordered to be raised, in twelve Troopes of fourscore in each beside officers, who are to be under the command of Our most deare and most intirely beloved Cousin Prince Rupert, shall be armed out of Our stoares remaining within Our office of the Ordinance, as followeth; that is to say, three corporalls, two serjeants, the gentlemen at armes, and twelve souldiers of each of the said twelve Troopes, are to have and carry each of them one halbard, and one case of pistolls with holsters; and the rest of the souldiers of the several Troopes aforesaid, are to have and to carry each of them one matchlocke musquet, with a collar of bandaliers, and also to have and to carry one bayonet[4], or great knife. That each lieutenant have and carry one partizan; and that two drums be delivered out for each Troope of the said Regiment[5]."
Several regiments of Horse and Dragoons were raised in the first year of the reign of King James II.; and the horsemen carried a short carbine[6] in addition to the sword and pair of pistols: and in a Regulation dated the 21st of February, 1687, the arms of the Dragoons at that period are commanded to be as follow:--
"The Dragoons to have snaphanse musquets, strapt, with bright barrels of three foote eight inches long, cartouch-boxes, bayonetts, granado pouches, bucketts, and hammer-hatchetts."
Richard Cannon's Historical Record of the Fourth, or Royal Irish Regiment of Dragoon Guards (1837) is a regimental history structured around official orders, inspection reports, and campaign summaries. The work opens with a General Order from 1836 commanding that each regiment's services be published under the Adjutant-General's direction, specifying details such as original formation, stations, battles, and badges. This bureaucratic framing shapes the entire narrative, which moves between administrative minutiae—like the 1809 order to cut hair short and abolish powder—and vivid campaign movements, such as the regiment's march from Belem to Abrantes, described as a 'romantic-looking town' on a precipice above the Tagus.
Structure: From General Orders to Battlefields
The record's structure mirrors its official purpose: it begins with the 1836 General Order that mandates the inclusion of specific details—formation dates, stations, battles, casualties, and badges. This directive is followed by a preface extolling the 'zeal and ardour' of the army, then a chronological narrative. The text alternates between dry administrative entries (e.g., 'a reduction of one hundred horses was also made to the establishment in 1808') and more expansive campaign descriptions. For instance, the 1811 embarkation for Portugal is recorded with precise numbers—'550 men, and 534 horses'—before shifting to a scenic description of Abrantes. This juxtaposition of ledger-like facts and evocative geography is a recurring structural feature.
Recurring Images: Horses, Hair, and Discipline
Horses are a constant presence, not merely as transport but as a measure of the regiment's effectiveness. The text notes when horses are transferred (e.g., 'twenty of the lightest to be transferred to the regiments of light dragoons') and when their condition deteriorates due to 'scarcity of forage.' Physical appearance of the men also receives attention: in 1809, 'the men's hair, which had been worn long and tied behind with a queue, was ordered to be cut short,' and the use of hair powder was abolished. These details, alongside inspection reports praising 'appearance and discipline,' reinforce a theme of controlled, standardized military bodies—both human and equine.
Movement Between Scenes: From Civil Unrest to Foreign War
The narrative moves fluidly between domestic policing and foreign combat. In 1810, four troops were 'employed under Major Ross in suppressing the riotous conduct of the workmen in the coal-districts' of Northumberland and Durham, a service that earned the regiment a silver vase from coal-owners. Just a year later, the same regiment embarked for Portugal to join Wellington's army against 'the legions of Bonaparte.' The transition from quelling civilian riots to fighting a continental enemy is presented without commentary, highlighting the dragoons' dual role as both internal peacekeepers and soldiers abroad. The text's matter-of-fact tone treats these shifts as routine.
The Regiment as a Bureaucratic Entity
Throughout the record, the regiment is depicted less as a collection of individuals and more as a bureaucratic unit subject to orders, inspections, and establishment changes. The 1836 General Order specifies that the account must include 'the Names of the Officers and the number of Non-Commissioned Officers and Privates, Killed or Wounded' and 'the Badges and Devices which the Regiment may have been permitted to bear.' The narrative follows this template, listing officers' names and casualties but rarely describing personal experiences. Even the regiment's nickname—'Fourth Royal Irish Dragoon Guards'—is consistently used in full, reinforcing its official identity. This bureaucratic lens shapes the reader's understanding of military history as a record of institutional continuity rather than individual heroism.
Readers approaching this record should expect a document that prioritizes official documentation over narrative drama. The text's value lies in its accumulation of specific details—horse transfers, hair regulations, inspection commendations—that collectively paint a picture of a regiment's daily life and operational history. Pay attention to the shifts between administrative data and campaign geography; these movements reveal the underlying rhythm of a military unit's existence as recorded by the Adjutant-General's office.
Reading Cannon’s dry, steady account of the Fourth Dragoon Guards—their horses, their quiet discipline—I found myself thinking of another old friend on the shelf. Its pages share that same unhurried patience with detail, that same respect for foot-sore marches and worn leather. There is comfort in such faithful records. I set mine down, and picked up the Historical record of the 71st Regiment Highland Light Infantry — Reading Companion, remembering how both speak of men simply enduring.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.