Ball's Bluff: An Episode and Its Consequences to Some of Us — Background and Themes

(0 User reviews)   1139
Peirson, Charles Lawrence, 1834- Project Gutenberg 2010 Not confirmed
Libby Prison; Ball's Bluff, Battle of, Va., 1861 Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 9,120
Reading time 40 min
Text sections 1

Ball's Bluff: An Episode and Its Consequences to Some of Us — Background and Themes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 9,120 words, 40 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.

The text analysis averages about 22.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Libby Prison,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

An eyewitness account of the Ball's Bluff battle and its aftermath, structured around the 20th Massachusetts Regiment's movements, the author's capture, and diary entries from Libby Prison, with a focus on the consequences for a small group of officers.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.4/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

AN EPISODE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES TO SOME OF US.

_A paper written for the Military Historical Society of Massachusetts_

BY CHARLES LAWRENCE PEIRSON

_Colonel and Brevet Brigadier General._

Privately printed by The Salem Press Company with permission from the Military Historical Society of Massachusetts for the information later on of Charles Lawrence Peirson, of New York, and Charles Peirson Lyman, of Massachusetts

THE SALEM PRESS COMPANY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS

THE EPISODE OF BALL'S BLUFF: AND ITS CONSEQUENCES TO SOME OF US.

This subject, like many of the periods of the Civil War, has been often described, and is familiar to the passing generation, but has, I believe, never before been placed upon your records, nor by an eye witness. Therefore, I venture to present it here.

The Twentieth Massachusetts Regiment of Volunteer Infantry, in which I had the honor to be a First Lieutenant and Adjutant, left Boston in the Autumn of 1861, for active service with the army. It was commanded by William Raymond Lee, as Colonel,--a West Point graduate. Paul J. Revere was the Major. It had been, before the date of the Ball's Bluff engagement, but a few weeks in the service, and was stationed first at Washington, where I remember calling with Colonel Lee, who knew them, upon General Scott, then commanding the Armies of the United States, and upon General McClellan, then Commander of the Army of the Potomac.

The men of the Regiment, like all of the troops in the East at that time, were untrained by battle, never having heard the sound of a hostile bullet, and were of no more value as soldiers than were the Militia Regiments. Soldiers are not soldiers until they have been long enough together to have acquaintance with and respect for their officers, and have learned obedience with a belief in discipline, with a willingness to abide by it. The earlier Battle of Bull Run, which became a rout for want of discipline, proved nothing and taught nothing except the after-thought of the necessity of discipline.

Up to this time (1861), the important arms of Cavalry and Artillery had been almost entirely neglected, most of the Cavalry not yet being armed or equipped.

General McClellan, who was in command when we joined the Army of the Potomac, was a thoroughly educated soldier. Soon after his graduation from West Point, he was employed in the construction of the first Pacific Railway. Later he was selected as one of a Commission to study the Art of War in Europe. For a time he was with the Allied Armies in the Crimean War, with every possibility of instructing himself in siege operations, construction of military bridges and use of pontoons, and the accepted order of battle for the different arms of the service. Always occupied with matters of large importance, and with all these military experiences, he became the best equipped man for the command of the Union Army. General McClellan was the most popular Commander that the Army ever had. The men thoroughly believed in him. Certainly the country owed much to him for the thorough organization of the Army, which enabled less qualified Commanders, (before the time of Meade and Grant), to accomplish something with it.

The Twentieth Massachusetts Regiment was attached to General Stone's Corps of Observation, and was encamped near Edward's Ferry on the Potomac River, some three miles from Ball's Bluff. General Stone was an accomplished soldier and we all respected him as such.

We were part of the Brigade of General F. W. Lander. I had known him well in Salem, where our families resided. He had had a most adventurous life as an explorer, having once crossed the continent from San Francisco to the East, alone, his companion having died on the journey. His courage was unquestioned, and he had military ability.

General Evans, who was the Confederate Commander of the enemy's forces near Leesburg, expected General Stone to attack him from Edward's Ferry, and was slow in moving troops to the vicinity of Ball's Bluff in consequence. On October 20th, General McClellan received information that the enemy had withdrawn from their advanced post at Leesburg, and so advised General Stone, suggesting a demonstration to confirm this fact, or to accomplish it.

The narrative opens with a precise roster of the Twentieth Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry's field and staff, naming Surgeon Henry Bryant, Lieutenant Colonel Francis W. Palfrey, Quartermaster Charles W. Folsom, Major Paul J. Revere, Adjutant Charles L. Peirson, Colonel William Raymond Lee, and Assistant Surgeon Nathan Hayward. This list immediately establishes the work as a regimental monograph, not a general history. Peirson, writing as a participant, notes that the regiment had been only a few weeks in service before Ball's Bluff and that its men were “untrained by battle, never having heard the sound of a hostile bullet.” He contrasts this inexperience with the professional background of General McClellan, whom he describes as “a thoroughly educated soldier.” The opening thus frames the battle as an episode in the education of a green regiment.

Structure of a Monograph

The work is organized as a paper read before the Military Historical Society of Massachusetts, privately printed in 1913. Its structure moves from a regimental introduction to the battle narrative, then to the author's capture and imprisonment, and concludes with appended extracts from letters and a diary. This layered format—memoir, official record, and personal document—gives the text a hybrid quality. Peirson explicitly states that the subject “has been often described” but never before placed on the Society's records “by an eye witness.” The inclusion of a diary written in Libby Prison and letters from General Lander and Governor Andrew provides multiple perspectives within a single account. The diary entries are terse and dated, recording visits from Dr. Gibson and letters received, while the letters convey official news of the capture. This juxtaposition of formal and informal sources creates a mosaic of evidence rather than a continuous narrative.

Recurring Images of Inexperience and Discipline

Peirson repeatedly emphasizes the raw state of the troops. He writes that the men were “of no more value as soldiers than were the Militia Regiments” and that “soldiers are not soldiers until they have been long enough together.” The earlier Battle of Bull Run is invoked as a rout “for want of discipline,” and Peirson insists that it “proved nothing and taught nothing except the after-thought of the necessity of discipline.” This refrain of untrained soldiers facing battle recurs in the description of the regiment's first weeks in Washington. The image of the untried regiment is contrasted with the professional standing of Colonel Lee, a West Point graduate, and General McClellan's European studies. The battle itself is not described in the excerpts, but the framing suggests that Ball's Bluff became another lesson in the cost of inexperience. The diary entry for December 31, 1861, reflects a grim resolve: “The more I see of this terrible war, the more I deplore it and the more I see the necessity of continuing it.”

Movement Between Scenes: Washington to Prison

The text shifts from the regiment's station in Washington to the battlefield, then to the prisoner's experience in Richmond. Peirson recalls calling with Colonel Lee upon General Scott and General McClellan, a scene of polite military protocol. The battle itself is not excerpted, but its aftermath is conveyed through letters: General Lander's letter to Peirson's mother reports that “proper means of transportation not having been provided our troops outnumbered five to one could not be reinforced.” The Governor's letter states that the officers “became prisoners through their gallantry having given up their boat to the wounded soldiers.” The diary then places the reader in Libby Prison, where Peirson records a visit from General Winder reading an order about hostages, and a meeting with Dr. Gibson. The movement from the capital's offices to the prison cell is abrupt, mirroring the sudden reversal of fortune. The diary's clipped entries—notes of letters received, a visit from a doctor—convey the constrained daily life of a prisoner of war.

The Diary as a Window into Captivity

The extracts from a diary written in Libby Prison offer a stark contrast to the earlier regimental narrative. The entries are brief and factual: “Received letter from Wm. G. Saltonstall very kindly offering to send me anything”; “Dr. Gibson, C.S. Army, sent for us.” Peirson records that he told Dr. Gibson he would call upon him only when in want, adding, “There were many things that he might have offered to do, but which I would not ask for.” This restraint is characteristic of the diary's tone. The entry for December 31, 1861, reflects on the year as “Probably the most momentous one since we were a people” and expresses a hope for peace while affirming the necessity of continuing the war. The diary does not describe the prison's physical conditions in detail, but the accumulation of small incidents—a letter received, a visit from a Confederate officer—builds a picture of endurance. The diary ends with the year's close, leaving the reader with the sense of an unfinished story.

Readers should approach this text as a primary document that combines multiple genres: the regimental history, the personal memoir, and the prison diary. The work does not attempt to cover the entire Battle of Ball's Bluff but focuses on the experience of one regiment and the consequences for its officers. The appended letters and diary entries provide raw material that the narrative alone does not interpret. Pay attention to the shifts in voice—from the formal tone of the monograph to the private voice of the diary—and consider how the structure itself reflects the fragmentation of war experience.

Reading Ball's Bluff, I lingered on those Libby Prison diary entries—how the officers held onto small routines to keep their minds intact. That quiet discipline reminded me of another kind of patience, the careful way Terrain Exercises — Inside the Classic unfolds its drills, step by step, as if savoring each detail. Both feel like whispered accounts of endurance, measured not in glory but in steady, private practices.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What was your reading experience?

Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

How easy was the book to follow?

Related eBooks