Ditching Procedure, B-29s with Four-Gun Turret — Reading Notes
Edition facts
Before opening Ditching Procedure, B-29s with Four-Gun Turret — Reading Notes, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 4,949 words, 22 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 17.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “B-29 (Bomber) -- Handbooks, manuals, etc.,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
HEADQUARTERS, PYOTE ARMY AIR FIELD
Office of the Director of Training
SUBJECT: Ditching Procedure, B-29's with Four-Gun Turret
TO: All Holders of 2AF manuals 50-26, 50-27, 50-37, 50-43, 50-56 and 100-7 Sec. IV
1. In accordance with 2AF Ltr. 50-36, 2 June 1945, the inclosed procedures are effective immediately and will be inserted in all copies of the above-listed manuals now in use or to be issued for use.
By order of Lt. Col. ZUMWALT:
HENRY E. BERGSCHNEIDER,
(2AF Manuals 50-26, 50-27, 50-56, 50-37, 50-43, 100-7 Sec. IV. Rev 2 June 1945.)
1. The first series of ditching positions for the B-29 were suggested by the "BOEING AIRCRAFT COMPANY", manufacturers of the aircraft. These positions were on trial, but were as logical as could be devised without actual ditching experience. The Boeing procedure and its various modifications have all been steps in the right direction. Changes have been based on actual ditching experience and procedures set forth here are results of all ditching experiences to date. They are not to be considered permanent. As new ditching characteristics of the B-29 are learned, they will be incorporated to assure the safest procedures possible.
2. The importance of these approved methods cannot be stressed too highly. Modifications in these procedures may NOT be made at the discretion of the airplane commander.
3. Experience to date proves that ditching characteristics of the B-29 are superior to those of any other aircraft now used by the Army Air Forces. The greatest factor in ditching is the airplane's buoyancy qualities. The B-29 has demonstrated, even during mediocre ditchings, that it will stay afloat for long periods and does not sink easily. On a moderately successful ditching, the aircraft is apt to stay afloat for at least ten (10) minutes and may float for several hours.
4. Ditching impacts are severe. Every precaution must be taken to pad against impact in the ditching position. Parachute, cushions, clothing, etc., will be used for this purpose. During impact the individual's head must be well protected. The flak helmet will be worn only when the head can be braced against something substantial. In all positions, the legs should be flexed to absorb the effects of a sudden jar.
5. When injured crew members are aboard they will be put in the proper positions and/or supported between the legs of other crew position. This may be difficult, but it has proven successful on numerous occasions.
6. Ditching position practice, as a part of completed ditching drill, is a "MUST" for all combat crews. Every step in ditching procedure must be practiced and learned thoroughly by the entire crew as a unit, in order to eliminate confusion. Practice it against time until the entire process becomes second nature.
Paragraphs 7 through 91 are Ditching Procedure instructions for the various B-29 crew positions. These are reproduced separately for insertion in the applicable S.O.P.'s for these positions.
92. If time permits, take one or more parachutes from the ditched aircraft. The silk can be used to catch rain water and the shrouds have no end of use. The web belt, which supports the canteen, should be buckled on after removal of flak vests.
93. Prior to ditching all escape hatches will be jettisoned or opened to prevent jamming in the event that the fuselage accordions.
94. An important phase of crew cooperation is the estimation of time remaining aloft and the position where the ditching will take place. The most efficient Air-Sea Rescue Agency is only as efficient as the cooperation it receives from crews in distress. The rescue agency must get notification of the ditching and the position. Crews must practice transmitting procedure until it becomes S.O.P. The engineer, with the information available, will make an estimate as to the time remaining aloft. This information will to passed to the navigator, who, on the basis of the information supplied, will estimate the position of ditching. The position will be given to the radio operator who will transmit the information to personnel who can effect a rescue.
95. This system of cooperation will not always be applicable, but it is a framework for crew cooperation.
96. Combat crews are subject to last-minute changes in aircraft. Therefore, it is essential to standardize the location of emergency equipment within the aircraft. Individual responsibility for the removal of this equipment must also be fixed.
97. The locations of the emergency equipment are based on their accessibility for the crews when in ditching position.
98. The later B-29 aircraft are equipped with the new modified E-2 raft. This raft has its accessory kit lashed to the raft itself. The older type utilizes the A-3 raft which stows the accessory kit in the airplane proper.
This 1945 U.S. Army Air Forces manual, issued as an insert for multiple existing manuals, lays out ditching procedures for B-29 bombers equipped with four-gun turrets. The language is direct and imperative, reflecting the high stakes of emergency water landings. The opening memorandum, signed by Major Henry E. Bergschneider, establishes the document's authority and immediate applicability. The text balances technical precision with a sense of urgency, as seen in phrases like 'the importance of these approved methods cannot be stressed too highly.' It also acknowledges the provisional nature of the procedures, noting they are 'results of all ditching experiences to date' and subject to change as new data emerges.
Voice of Authority and Provisional Knowledge
The manual's voice is unmistakably military: commands are absolute, yet the text repeatedly admits uncertainty. The opening paragraph credits Boeing for initial ditching positions, calling them 'as logical as could be devised without actual ditching experience.' This phrasing reveals a reliance on theory before real-world data. The document then asserts that changes have been 'based on actual ditching experience,' but immediately cautions that procedures are 'not to be considered permanent.' This tension between authoritative command and empirical humility runs throughout. The prohibition against modifications 'at the discretion of the airplane commander' underscores the hierarchy, while the acknowledgment that new characteristics will be incorporated shows a system open to revision. The voice is that of an institution learning from its mistakes, speaking with confidence but leaving room for future correction.
Pace and Structure: From General to Specific
The manual's pace shifts noticeably from broad context to granular instruction. Early paragraphs establish the B-29's ditching superiority, citing buoyancy and float times—'at least ten (10) minutes and may float for several hours.' This general reassurance gives way to abrupt, terse commands: 'Ditching impacts are severe. Every precaution must be taken to pad against impact.' The sentence fragments and imperative mood accelerate the rhythm. Later sections, though not fully excerpted, likely continue this pattern, moving from overarching principles to step-by-step drills. The structure mirrors the psychological progression from understanding the aircraft's capabilities to executing precise actions under pressure. The repeated emphasis on practice—'ditching position practice, as a part of completed ditching drill, is a "MUST"'—reinforces the need for rote learning to overcome the chaos of an actual ditching.
Recurring Details: Buoyancy, Impact, and Crew Roles
Three details recur with notable frequency. First, buoyancy: the manual stresses that the B-29 'does not sink easily' and can float for extended periods, a point made twice in the opening section. This emphasis likely aims to boost crew confidence. Second, impact severity: the text warns that impacts are 'severe' and repeatedly instructs on padding—using parachutes, cushions, and clothing—and protecting the head with flak helmets only when braced. The instruction to 'flex legs to absorb the effects of a sudden jar' appears as a specific physical directive. Third, crew coordination: the manual addresses injured crew members, advising they be 'supported between the legs of other crew position,' a vivid detail that underscores the cramped, collaborative environment. These recurring elements—buoyancy, impact mitigation, and crew interdependence—form the manual's core concerns, each tied to the physical realities of ditching a large bomber.
Readers should approach this manual as a historical artifact of military aviation training, not a standalone narrative. The excerpts reveal a document shaped by wartime urgency and empirical feedback. Pay attention to the interplay between absolute commands and conditional language—this tension reflects the manual's dual purpose: to enforce discipline while acknowledging the limits of knowledge. The text rewards close reading for its technical specificity and the implicit human drama of crews preparing for the worst.
There’s something humbling about a manual written by people who actually had to use it, every line carrying the weight of real water and real fear. It reminds me of picking up The Thirty Years War — Volume 01 — Reading Notes and feeling that same quiet ache—how carefully we record survival, knowing the next chapter rarely asks for our opinion.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.