British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794 Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army" — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews) 70

In Category - Science Fiction Utopias

Authors: Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir, 1859-1933 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2022 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century; Flanders -- History, Military Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 121,849

Reading time 530 min

Text sections 27

This digital edition of British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794 Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army" — A Reader’s Guide is described by source-level measurements including 121,849 words, 8 hr 50 min estimated reading time, and 27 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 27.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #67310

Fortescue's extracts from his multi-volume history trace British campaigns in Flanders from 1690 to 1794, with a focus on tactical decisions, command disputes, and the physical toll of marches and battles. The excerpts reveal a narrative built around specific engagements and the friction between allied commanders.

Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg67310

Read the Text

ening power of France. Few studies are more difficult, even to the professed student, than that of the old campaigns in Flanders, and still fewer more hopeless of simplification to the ordinary reader. Nevertheless, however desperate the task, an effort must be made once for all to give a broad idea of the scene of innumerable great actions.

Taking his stand on the northern frontier of France and looking northward, the reader will note three great rivers running through the country before him in, roughly speaking, three parallel semicircles, from south-east to north-west. These are, from east to west, the Moselle, which is merged in the Rhine at Coblentz, the Meuse, and the Scheldt, all three of which discharge themselves into the great delta whereof the southern key is Antwerp. But for the present let the reader narrow the field from the Meuse in the east to the sea in the west, and let him devote his attention first to the Meuse. He will see that, a little to the north of the French frontier, it picks up a large tributary from the south-west, the Sambre, which runs past Maubeuge and Charleroi and joins the Meuse at Namur. Thence the united rivers flow on past the fortified towns of Huy, Liège, and Maestricht to the sea. But let the reader’s northern boundary on the Meuse for the present be Maestricht, and let him note another river which rises a little to the west of Maestricht and runs almost due west past Arschot and Mechlin to the sea at Antwerp. Let this river, the Demer, be his northern, and the Meuse from Maestricht to Namur his eastern, boundary.

Returning to the south, let him note a river rising immediately to the west of Charleroi, the Haine, which joins the Scheldt at Tournay, and let him draw a line from Tournay westward through Lille and Ypres to the sea at Dunkirk. Let this line from Dunkirk to Charleroi be carried eastward to Namur; and there is his southern boundary. His western boundary is, of course, the sea. Within this quadrilateral, Antwerp (or more strictly speaking the mouth of the Scheldt), Dunkirk, Namur, and Maestricht, lies the most famous fighting-ground of Europe.

Glancing at it on the map, the reader will see that this quadrilateral is cut by a number of rivers running parallel to each other from south to north, and flowing into the main streams of the Demer and the Scheldt. The first of these, beginning from the east, are the Great and Little Geete, which become one before they join the main stream. It is worth while to pause for a moment over this little slip of land between the Geete and the Meuse. We shall see much of Namur, Huy, Liège, and Maestricht, which command the navigation of the greater river, but we shall see still more of the Geete, and of two smaller streams, the Jaar and the Mehaigne, which rise almost in the same table-land with it. On the Lower Jaar, close to Maestricht, stands the village of Lauffeld, which shall be better known to us fifty years hence. On the Little Geete, just above its junction with its greater namesake, are the villages of Neerwinden and Landen. In the small space between the heads of the Geete and the Mehaigne lies the village of Ramillies. For this network of streams is the protection against an enemy that would threaten the navigation of the Meuse from the north and west, and the barrier of Spanish Flanders against invasion from the east; and the ground is rich with the corpses and fat with the blood of men.

The next stream to westward is the Dyle, which flows past Louvain to the Demer, and gives its name, after the junction, to that river. The next in order is the Senne, which flows past Park and Hal and Brussels to the same main stream. At the head of the Senne stands the village of Steenkirk; midway between the Dyle and Senne are the forest of Soignies and the field of Waterloo.

Continue Reading →

Fortescue opens with William III's campaigns, but the excerpts quickly shift to the Duke of York's operations in 1793–94, where the narrative is driven by logistical strain and command friction. The author's voice is precise and critical, noting that Murray 'begged persistently that more cavalry should be given to the Duke of York' and that 'the result was exactly that which he had expected.' The text is dense with place names, troop numbers, and the dates of marches, reflecting Fortescue's method of building analysis from granular detail.

The excerpts do not provide a continuous story; they are selected episodes that highlight recurring patterns: the difficulty of coordinating allied forces, the impact of heat and exhaustion on troops, and the gap between Austrian and British tactical thinking. A reader new to the subject will find that the narrative assumes familiarity with the broader war context, but the specific moments—like the march to Linselles—are vivid and self-contained.

The Weight of Command Decisions

Fortescue repeatedly shows commanders making choices under pressure, with consequences spelled out in the next paragraph. In the excerpt, Murray's request for more cavalry is refused, and the Duke of York's column, after 'a march of eleven hours on a day of extraordinary heat,' cannot cross the river. The author does not simply report events; he highlights the reasoning—or lack of it—behind orders. The Austrian General Coburg sends Hohenlohe to 'superintend' the Duke, a detail that underscores distrust. Fortescue's phrasing, 'the arrangements of the day opened Murray's eyes to the essential vices of the Austrian tactics,' shows how a single failed operation becomes a lesson. Readers should watch for these moments where a tactical setback prompts a broader judgment about military systems.

The Physical Reality of Marching and Fighting

The excerpts are filled with references to the physical condition of troops: 'the troops at the front' are the intended audience of the original 1918 preface, and the text itself emphasizes exhaustion, heat, and distance. The brigade of Guards at Linselles 'had just arrived at Menin after a severe march' and then 'traversed the six miles to Linselles in little more than an hour.' Fortescue notes that they were 'little over eleven hundred strong' and without their flank companies. The hill at Linselles is described as 'fairly steep on its northern face,' with redoubts and a barricade. These details ground the narrative in the soldiers' experience, making the abstract numbers of men and miles concrete. The reader should note how often the success or failure of an operation hinges on whether troops have rested or eaten.

Allied Friction and Divergent Objectives

A persistent thread in the excerpts is the tension between British and Austrian commanders. Coburg presses the Duke of York to stay and attack Cambrai, but the Duke 'could only obey his instructions as to Dunkirk.' The phrase 'much despised Briton' appears in Murray's reflection on Austrian tactics, revealing mutual contempt. Fortescue does not take sides explicitly, but he records that 'the Austrians, of course, blamed the Duke of York.' The reader sees a pattern: the British are constrained by orders from London, while the Austrians operate with a different strategic logic. The separation of the armies after the engagement is presented as inevitable, with Coburg 'weakened by the withdrawal of nine thousand Prussian troops.' These passages show how coalition warfare creates its own obstacles beyond the enemy's actions.

Fortescue's Use of Maps and Sidenotes

The digital edition includes 27 maps and plans, as well as 439 sidenotes that often give dual Julian and Gregorian dates. Fortescue's text refers to these maps directly—for instance, the list of maps includes 'Linselles' and 'Tourcoing.' The reader should consult the maps when they appear, as the narrative assumes geographic knowledge. The sidenotes also provide a timeline: the excerpt from the 1794 campaign includes dates like 'Aug. 7' and 'Aug. 13' in the margin. Fortescue's prose moves quickly between locations—Baisieux, Tourcoing, Menin, Linselles—and the maps help track the columns. The endnotes (converted from footnotes) add context, such as note 144 about Murray's letter. A first-time reader will benefit from pausing at each map to orient themselves before the action unfolds.

Fortescue's extracts reward a reader who pays attention to the interplay of command, terrain, and troop welfare. The narrative does not offer a complete history of the Flanders campaigns; it selects episodes that illustrate systemic problems in the British army's operations. To get the most from this book, read with a map at hand and note how often the outcome of a battle is decided before the first shot—by the distance marched, the orders given, or the allies' trust. The author's voice is that of a military historian who expects his audience to learn from past mistakes.

Reading Fortescue’s accounts of weary troops trudging through Flemish mud, I remembered my grandfather’s old copy of Infantry Drill Regulations, United States Army, 1911 Corrected to April 15, 1917 (Changes Nos. 1 to 19) — Inside the Classic. Its rigid, precise steps felt achingly fragile, like a whispered promise against the chaos those earlier soldiers faced.