Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia — Edition Insights
Edition facts
Before opening Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia — Edition Insights, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 18,748 words, 1 hr 22 min estimated reading time, and 23 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 19.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Fort Pulaski National Monument (Ga.),” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
t an end. When the British returned in force to reoccupy Savannah in December 1778, the great fleet rendezvoused at the anchorage off Cockspur Point, but the island lay deserted and undisturbed.
After the United States was established as a nation, new defenses were needed to safeguard the young republic, and, in accord with President Washington’s national defense policy, a second fort was built in 1794-95, on Cockspur Island. Named Fort Greene in honor of the Revolutionary hero, Gen. Nathanael Greene, who after the war made his home at Mulberry Grove Plantation near Savannah, this fortification consisted of a battery designed for six guns, and was constructed of timbers and earth enclosed behind pickets. There was also a guardhouse for the garrison.
The history of Fort Greene was brief and tragic. Nine years after the fort was built, it was totally destroyed and a part of the garrison was drowned in the great hurricane that swept Cockspur in September 1804. Huge sea waves raked the island from end to end until not a vestige of the fort remained. A quarter of a century was then to elapse before Cockspur Island was again to be selected as the site of a fortification to command the Savannah River.
_The New Fort on Cockspur_
The United States can be proud of her victories in the War of 1812, but there were also defeats. It was fortunate that while England was fighting on this side of the Atlantic, her principal forces were engaged in a death struggle with Napoleon on the continent of Europe. American defenses were deplorably weak. On thousands of miles of coastline there was scarcely a fort to oppose the enemy. British troops pillaged and burned the city of Washington and laid waste to many sections along the Middle Atlantic States. This humiliating and tragic lesson soon aroused public opinion to demand strong measures for protection.
After the Treaty of Ghent in 1814, which terminated the war with Britain, President James Madison urged Congress to appropriate funds to complete all forts then under construction and to extend the system of fortifications in order that the United States might at all times be prepared to prevent or repel the danger of foreign invasion.
The task of developing entirely new and adequate fortifications along the far-flung Atlantic and Gulf coasts was one which required the direction of a military expert with special engineering abilities. The Government’s search for a person peculiarly fitted for this position resulted in securing the services of the distinguished French fortification and military engineer, Gen. Simon Bernard, who was then seeking employment in the United States.
A graduate of the École Polytechnique in Paris, Bernard had served with distinction in many of the campaigns of Napoleon. He displayed such outstanding abilities in fortification and engineering tactics that he soon acquired an enviable reputation. In 1815, after the Battle of Waterloo, he came to the United States at the suggestion of Joseph Bonaparte, bearing high recommendations to government officials from Lafayette and Albert Gallatin. With the consent of Congress, which had authorized the employment of a “skillful assistant,” President Madison commissioned Bernard in the Corps of Engineers with the rank of brigadier general by brevet. Early in December 1816, by direct order of the President, General Bernard, Col. William McRee, and Col. Joseph G. Totten formed a new “Board of Engineers,” the duties of which were to devise a system of seacoast defense for the entire country.
President Monroe, who succeeded Madison, was even more energetic than his predecessor in promoting the construction of new defenses. During his administration fortification policies were established, surveys were completed, and funds were provided to start construction.
Cockspur Island was chosen as the site for a new fort in March 1821, when the river approaches to Savannah were surveyed by Capt. John Le Conte under the personal supervision of Bernard, but construction on Cockspur was not begun until 1829. Plans approved by Bernard in 1827 proved to be unsuitable and a revised plan was prepared in 1831. The fort, as originally designed, was a massive 2-story structure mounting 3 tiers of guns. The deep mud of Cockspur, however, offered no foundation for so great a weight. In revising the plans, it was necessary to reduce the height of the walls and to provide heavy wooden piles and grillage to support the brick masonry.
The narrative opens with a sweeping geographical description of the Savannah River, from its origins in the Appalachian Mountains to its sluggish passage through cypress swamps and salt marshes before reaching the sea. This movement from high valleys to tidal flats establishes a recurring pattern in the handbook: the interplay between natural landscape and human military engineering. The fort itself is presented as a product of this environment, built on a low, marshy island that posed constant challenges to construction and defense.
From Cockspur Island to Fort Pulaski
The handbook traces the site's evolution from an undeveloped island, first noted in 1733, to a fortified outpost. Early descriptions emphasize the difficulty of building on the marshy ground, requiring extensive drainage and pile-driving. The narrative moves through the construction phases under different military engineers, noting the slow progress and the eventual completion of the massive five-sided brick structure. The text repeatedly contrasts the ambitious design with the practical obstacles of the location, foreshadowing the fort's later vulnerability.
The Siege as a Turning Point
The bombardment of April 10–11, 1862, is depicted with precise chronological detail, from the opening shots at dawn to the surrender the following afternoon. The account highlights the ineffectiveness of mortar shells against the fort's walls—they "threw up harmless geysers of mud"—while solid shot from rifled cannon caused the whole structure to "quiver and shake." This contrast between weapon types is a central structural device, illustrating the technological shift that made the fort obsolete. The narrative also notes the symbolic act of re-raising the flag under fire, a moment of defiance within the larger story of inevitable defeat.
The Fort as a Microcosm of Conflict
Beyond the military action, the handbook includes episodes that reveal the human dimensions of the siege. The amputation of a wounded gunner's arm, the single Federal casualty from a solid shot entering an embrasure, and the later imprisonment of Confederate officers in the fort's casemates all serve as focal points. These details are woven into the broader narrative without sentimentality, grounding the strategic analysis in concrete, often grim, realities. The recurring image of the fort's walls being "flaked away" or "laid bare" reinforces the theme of exposure—both physical and tactical.
Movement Between Scales
The handbook shifts fluidly between wide-angle views—the river's course, the regional geography—and close-up observations of damage to specific embrasures or the behavior of individual soldiers. This structural oscillation mirrors the siege itself, where commanders on Tybee Island could see the fort's scars accumulating while inside the walls men struggled with dismounted guns and falling masonry. The final sections, covering the fort's post-war use and its eventual designation as a national monument, bring the narrative full circle, returning to the landscape that first shaped its story.
Readers should pay attention to the way the handbook uses physical details—the depth of a breach, the trajectory of a shot, the condition of a wall—to convey larger strategic and human truths. The text is as much about the relationship between terrain and technology as it is about a single battle. By moving between the general and the specific, it offers a model for understanding how place and event become intertwined in historical memory.
I finished the Fort Pulaski handbook the other evening, and something about those old brick walls staying stubborn against impossible odds stayed with me for days. It reminded me of another quiet journey — Military Roads of the Mississippi Basin — A Reader’s Guide — how paths themselves carry weight long after their purpose fades. That same hush lingers there.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Before you leave, reflect on the book
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.